7 he says: “Many of the above mentioned works, by way of quoting with acknowledgements the sutras, karikas and slokas pertaining to materialistic school of thought, hold out a clear and unmistakable evidence to the effect that there once existed, at least, two works of the Indian materialists, namely the Barhaspatya- Sutra and the Lokayata Sastra. Heera cannot seem to decide whether or not the Charvakas had any actual texts, or not. The book also contains numerous internal contradictions. Heera claims that Charvakas quote scripture in defense of their position, a claim which derives completely from Madhvacharya’s account, and without which would seem bizarre. Heera’s work largely falls prey to Chattopadhyaya’s criticism, without attempting to justify why Madhvacharya’s account should be accepted as basically consistent with actual Charvaka practice.
Thus, the uncritical reliance on Madhvacharya’s account renders most accounts of Charvaka distorted. Madhvacharya tried to “put himself in the shoes” of his opponent, which often led to him presenting a position derived from a blending of his own Vedantic beliefs, and the beliefs of the opposing system, as purely the beliefs of the opposing system. Chattopadhyaya for example, points out that most of the academic viewpoints on Charvaka rely on the description of the philosophy which is contained in Madhvacharya’s. I also found that many of the book’s claims were either sourced in a frustratingly obscure way (i. Heera doesn’t offer a new perspective on Charvaka, nor does he synthesize some of the existing viewpoints on Charvaka into one coherent conception, nor does he give a clearly worded survey of the range of theories about Charvaka. The Carvaka system of philosophy has been much criticized and even.
Carvaka is the materialistic system of thought propounded by the ancient philosophers of India. Bupender Heera’s doctoral thesis, so my expectations were high in terms of the scholarly quality of this text. And as I’ve got a lazy saturday afternoon on my hands, I’ll supply a short review: Uniqueness of Carvaka Philosophy in Traditional Indian Thought (or a version thereof) served as Dr. As this one was the shortest, I finished it first. I’m working on a much longer article (or series of articles?) on the Charvaka/Lokayata school of philosophy, so I’m going through a whole bunch of texts on the school of thought. Subhendu Sarkar: Book Review: Carvaka Philosophy - A New Look (Review of Studies on the Carvaka/Lokayata).īook Review: Uniqueness of Carvaka Philosophy in Traditional Indian Thought. In its most generic sense, 'Indian Materialism' refers to the school of thought within Indian philosophy that rejects. Open Book Publishers- open access academic.
0 kommentar(er)
